Fixed high-paying lazy people, which hurts employees and pits enterprises?

That makes sense. First of all, because the more units that keep idle people, the more right and wrong there will be. In fact, I don't think it is possible to raise lazy people with a fixed salary. At most, it is how much money to do and how much value to create for the enterprise. But even in this case, it is harmful to individuals.

The existence of this phenomenon itself proves that there are problems in the enterprise itself. Employees who enjoy this kind of treatment will generally fall into a quagmire, and the two are in a vicious circle. In the long run, whether it is the long-term development of the enterprise or the personal growth of employees, can he be good?

I can express myself, because I am in an awkward position and have a salary, but it doesn't mean that I don't have a well-paid job. The salary given by our boss depends on the benefits that individuals create for the company. I'm free and my salary is low, but I don't have much. Some people create more benefits for the boss, and the salary is of course high. The situation I am talking about belongs to private enterprises, and state-owned enterprises may also have this situation, but it is different from private enterprises.

A good enterprise and a good company can provide good development space for employees, and employees will create more value for the enterprise accordingly. Good enterprises, employees and enterprises * * * grow together, while bad enterprises are under siege, and employees muddle along. Do you think this situation hurts employees and pits enterprises?