The dispute between Google and Italy is not limited to this case, and there have been many similar incidents before. Because Google has opened branches in other countries, it only needs to teach these European countries a little tax to avoid high taxes, which also makes many countries very dissatisfied. Google has a great advantage, but under such circumstances, it still does not restrain its own behavior, but tries to monopolize the market. No matter in which country, Google's behavior is inappropriate and will lead to the dominance of technology companies.
In the face of problems, Google's attitude is very arrogant and even evasive. Public relations measures are very perfunctory and do not directly respond to online public opinion, which also makes Google's response lack sincerity and cannot be recognized by everyone. Previously, there were also tax problems between Google and France. Google didn't make a correct attitude when solving public opinion, so France also took anti-monopoly measures. If Google doesn't pay taxes according to the regulations, then the products can't be sold in France.
Now is the era of big data. Google has occupied a great advantage by technical means, and wants to further expand the user coverage, which has disrupted the market to a certain extent and occupied the dominant position in the Italian market. Google does not allow Italian electric car service to be used in Android system, which limits the development of Italian technology. Google's intention is mainly to apply Google Maps. Bian Xiao believes that Google should correctly handle this incident and not consume the public's trust.