I hope I can provide some language skills in the debate.

/programs/view/4oiGX9Pjc-c/

Text:

Zhong Jian: 500,000 years ago, our ancestor Beijingers lived in this land under our feet. Things have changed, and the stars have changed, saying goodbye to the past of eating and drinking blood. They learned to drill wood for fire. The use of fire is a great discovery that transcends the times. However, it was not until more than 100 years ago that scientists uncovered the law that mechanical energy was converted into heat energy, thus scientifically explaining the real mystery of drilling wood for fire. This irrefutably proves our position that it is easier said than done. The so-called "behavior" is the process of human action on external things, including the use of "knowledge"; The so-called "knowledge" refers to the understanding of "doing" and solving the problems of doing what, why and how. Understanding is both a process and a result. The so-called "easy to learn from difficulties" means that it is difficult to learn knowledge and easy to use. "Doing things despite difficulties" has nothing to do with "easier said than done" and must not be confused. We advocate walking despite difficulties for the following reasons: First, cognitive genetics tells us that after being a prophet, we should walk despite difficulties. People can do it at birth. The so-called "dancing". However, it is difficult to be a gentleman as knowledgeable as the other debater. Personal knowledge is endless, and human exploration is endless. "The deeper you drill, the stronger your back." Confucius insisted on studying Yi Zhuan in his later years, and his weft knitting was perfect, which shows that it is difficult to learn! Secondly, dialectics tells us that cognition and action are closely related. Human behavior is a process of continuous progress, in which knowledge is the key. The journey of ignorance is just a simple repetition. With knowledge, there will be conscious behavior; With knowledge, there is development and evolution. As a kind of (time warning) behavior, knowledge is a lighthouse and a guide to action; Only by mastering the knowledge and methods of business can you succeed. Know that after a long and arduous exploration, you will achieve something, so it is more difficult to know than to do. Third, daily experience tells us that it is not easy to do it. In the final analysis, knowing or knowing is not enough. As the saying goes, "it is not difficult to meet people, and it is not difficult to meet difficult people." That's the truth. Once you have mastered the knowledge and methods of doing things, you will be as skilled as an expert in understanding cows. To sum up, knowing is more difficult than doing. thank you

Gu Zhenhao: Hello, Madam President, ladies and gentlemen. The topic separates knowledge from practice, which requires us to discuss the difficulty. If pure cognition and action are confused, where do the difficulties come from? The first contradiction put forward by the opposing debater is that the process of action contains knowledge. Then I want to ask another debater, is it necessary to discuss at this time? Any era needs the cooperation of knowing and doing, but different eras need different theories of knowing and doing. Generally speaking, there are two kinds of knowledge, one is the conscience of morality and ethics, and the other is the knowledge of so-called scientific experience. Next, we discuss the relationship between "knowledge" and "behavior" from these two aspects respectively. First, looking around today's society, with the popularization of education and technology, people's moral behavior is deteriorating. At this time, the so-called eating, drinking, whoring, gambling, cheating and stealing, social unrest and order are the problems we have to face today. At this time, we can't help wondering, is it really difficult to know what is easy to do? Is it because knowledge, education and culture are not enough? Isn't the problem specific implementation and practice? Don't we know the so-called benevolence, righteousness, propriety and wisdom? Don't we know the so-called ordinary citizen morality? What does traditional Confucianism tell us? The so-called "goodness of human nature is more than water". There is nothing wrong with people, and there is nothing wrong with water. "Didn't Mencius also say that" benevolence, righteousness, propriety and wisdom "are the four ends of human beings? Mr. Wang Yangming even told us that today's so-called conscience is inherent in the heart and is innate. Therefore, we already know some basic principles of dealing with people, as well as the so-called general morality and conscience. Isn't this very clear and simple? Where is the difficulty? The difficulty is "ok"! The difficulty lies in the specific practice. Because of the slack of people's hearts, due to various restrictions and variables of the external environment, it is better to do things than to know difficulties! At this time, let's start from the second aspect. From the scientific experience, (time warning) is also easier said than done. Top quarks have long proved the existence of so-called top quark particles in physics, but we can't really grasp this concept until the accelerator is produced. After Einstein invented the theory of relativity, it took a long time for people to build an atomic bomb. To sum up, what common problems can we find? Common faults are one thing to say and another to do. So I just want to deconstruct and analyze what is easier said than done. Only when you know that knowing is easier than doing, and only when you know what you don't know, you don't want to do it. Therefore, knowing is not just knowing, and doing is not just doing. Knowing and doing must cooperate with each other. Therefore, after understanding the truth that it is easier said than done, it is necessary to prescribe the right medicine and hope to cure the disease! Thank you all

Wu Jianmin: Thank you, Madam President. Hello, everyone. Another debater put forward the view that "saying is one thing, doing is another". Obviously, they stole today's "relationship between knowledge and action" into "relationship between words and deeds". Just saying it means you really know it in your heart? Parrots can still speak human words after training, but can we say that these parrots are as knowledgeable as their opponents? Obviously not! Today, respecting knowledge, talents, developing high technology and opening up new fields has become a world trend. Humans have deeply understood that it is easy to walk despite difficulties. Only by facing difficulties directly can we walk briskly. The reason why we think what we know is difficult to do is more based on the following reasons. Firstly, it is more difficult to create knowledge than to use it. Today, people have turned a blind eye to electric lights, but Edison went through hardships and never changed his mind. He tried more than 1600 materials, made more than 10000 experiments and wrote 20000 pages of notes. You can see how hard it is to know. Dr. Sun Yat-sen, the great revolutionary forerunner, traveled all over the world and devoted himself to the study of revolution. He almost died in London, and finally worked hard to form People's Republic of China (PRC)'s founding strategy. Faced with such a fact, does the other debater have to tell everyone that it is easy to know? Schopenhauer put it well: "Great thinkers and scientists are the beacon of mankind, without them, mankind will drift in the confused sea"! Second, it is more difficult to explore methods than to use them. Seeking knowledge includes not only general principles, but also specific methods. Legend has it that the method of covering the soil with water for gun blindness in ancient times resulted in flooding; Taking his father as a mirror, Yu explored the method of unblocking, and finally achieved a comprehensive victory in flood control and disaster relief. Third, it is more difficult to know the law than to act according to law. Understanding the law is a process of skimming sand and collecting gold. Law is not a salesman, it will not come to you by itself, it needs unremitting exploration. The transformation and utilization of desert resources is a difficult problem to understand the law. Once human beings have overcome this problem, desert to oasis will no longer be a mirage. To sum up, understanding is a difficult and tortuous process. He needs the sense of responsibility that "the sky will fall for the people of Sri Lanka", the courage that "I will search up and down" and the perseverance that "many people will look for him". Therefore, we think that we should act despite difficulties. Thank you all.

Li: Hello, everyone. What kind of proposition did the other debater tell us? Another debater told us that knowing and not doing it is just unknown! Another debater, under such a proposition, let's see where today's argument should stand. If that's the case, the other debater told us that all the knowledge, everything you know is false unless you experience it one by one. Let's give an example. Today, I know that it is immoral to throw garbage, and I also know that it is moral not to throw garbage. Then when I am throwing garbage, can you tell me: I have forgotten morality at this time, and I don't know morality. After losing it, I suddenly realized that my morality appeared again. In other words, what did the other debater tell us? Under this framework, the other debater just tells us: knowing without doing it is just unknown. So what is knowledge? Is there anything I don't know? Don't forget a sentence: "knowing is knowing, not knowing is not knowing, just knowing." Don't confuse the opposing debater. Well, let me tell you from three aspects. Although it may be difficult to know, it is even harder to do. First of all, in terms of weather, Mencius said: "Although wise, it is better to make use of the situation;" Although there is a base, it is better to wait! " If it weren't for the situation of the Three Kingdoms, Liu Bei's three visits to the thatched cottage and the clever appearance of the east wind in Chibi, Kong Ming would not have been able to show his talents and become popular, that is, he would eventually fall into the "useless place for heroes"! Let's take a look at the limitations of the geographical environment. With the so-called development of construction technology today, it is easy to tell what methods and materials should be used to build the Three Gorges Dam, but it will definitely take 15 years from construction to completion. This project is huge and arduous, and it is all caused by the environment! Let's take another look. This is actually the logic in our human life, and it is difficult to know what is easy. Everyone knows that men and women should care about each other and men should treat women equally, but after 20 years of long women's movement, women's status has not been rehabilitated, so we should hold a women's conference in Beijing and continue our efforts! What we want to tell you is that the objects of today's society, whether environmental protection, women's rights, democracy, legal system, education, peace, culture and morality, all embody the truth that it is easier said than done. Only when we have a clear understanding of the true meaning of knowing what is easy and difficult can we understand it thoroughly. As far as sitting posture is concerned, getting up and walking is a common problem in China. Only by taking the right medicine can we get rid of the disease, make everyone dare to be ashamed of empty talk, and give full play to the spirit of China's traditional fools moving mountains.

Lu Han: When they argue with us about morality and ethics, they always say one thing and do another. So, do you really understand morality? Then please ask the other debater to explain to us what "benevolence, righteousness and morality are full, thieves and prostitutes are full". The other debater also said that some people didn't know it, but said they didn't want to do it. So, is this an excuse for thieves? Because the thief said, "I really don't know that stealing is bad, but I can't help but reach out my third hand"! The other side argues that men need more care than women, so since the other side argues that knowing is easy, we want to ask the other side a question, how can we open a man's closed heart? How can we make a man an open man? Well, today we think it's easy to know. Turning the page of history, the great cause of human understanding and exploration can be described as "earth-shattering, crying ghosts and gods." "Life is precious", but Lilienthal gave his life for science; "Love is more expensive", but Nobel lived alone for his career. As you must know, after tasting hundreds of herbs, Li Shizhen obtained the "rejuvenation"; Sima Qian made great efforts to govern and eventually became a "family statement." Another debater must know that Darwin worked hard for decades to give birth to the theory of evolution. Bruno condensed the truth with his life. "The soul goes back and forth." "Difficulties and hardships, Yucheng." Throughout the ages, it is these knowledge seekers who have knocked on the door of knowledge with blood and life that have cast the backbone of human civilization. Face up to real life, the journey is not always smooth, as the debater said. However, a deep understanding of knowledge tells us that it is more difficult to know than to act. The road to knowledge is long, and human beings are seeking it from top to bottom. Peace is difficult, and the difficulty is that the understanding of all countries has not yet been reached; Anti-corruption is also difficult, and the difficulty is that we don't know the real way to stop corruption; It is more difficult to cure AIDS, and the difficulty lies in the lack of breakthrough in medical knowledge. With knowledge, it will be easier to do things. Extensive and profound knowledge and incisive ideas are really hard-won, but what you get is courage in action and calmness in work. Overseas telephone calls make us close to the sky, and radio waves tell us the truth; Credit card allows us to "travel all over the world with one card in hand". Today, we think it's easy to learn from difficulties, but we must overcome them. As the great German scientist Hilbert said, "We must know, and we will know."

Liu: Thank you, Madam President. Hello, everyone. We found two fallacies from the beginning of the argument. The first fallacy, the "knowledge" of the opponent's debater, is actually what Mr. Wang Yangming said. This kind of true knowledge is actually "the unity of knowing and doing"! Please don't confuse your opponent. In this case, knowledge includes behavior, so what is the need for us as the opposing party to discuss behavior? The second fallacy put forward by the opponent's debater is that if the opponent thinks that the knowledge obtained by constant checking in the action is called "knowledge", what he asks the opponent is, at this stage, how do you judge that your knowledge is no longer a fallacy, but it can already become "knowledge". So where did such knowledge come from? In other words, the fallacy made by the other debater can be said to be that knowledge is regarded as the unity of knowing and doing. Such a combination of knowledge and action is inappropriate in this topic. Therefore, we find that the topics discussed in this university debate contest, from the unity of money and morality to the spirit of ignorance, from the maintenance of social order to the equality of rights between men and women, are all discussing the spiritual problems of today's mankind, and people's moral conscience has gradually dimmed. So the focus of our discussion should be on people's moral conscience. We believe that it is easier said than done today for three reasons. First, Mencius once said: "People are different from animals, and things are rare." This is the most subtle and huge thing, that is, people's moral conscience. Therefore, he said, "Those who are capable but have no knowledge have a conscience; If you don't know, you have a conscience. " Wang Yangming also told us that conscience is to people's hearts, and there is no need to distinguish between sages and ignorance! We can find that conscience transcends Wan Chuan, and it is true to seek outside. Do you know how hard it is? It is easy to know! Second, it is undeniable that conscience will be blinded by selfish desires, but we must never say that people have no conscience just because their conscience is blinded. It's like the moon is covered by dark clouds. Can we say that there is no moon in this world? Once cheated, you must get rid of it. So today we put forward a point here to tell you that it is difficult to know. You know what's the hardest part? It is difficult to have the right time, place and people. We are born with bad times, bad geographical conditions with dangerous situations and thorns everywhere, and people who are short-sighted, lazy and fickle and weak-willed. How can you say that it is easier said than done? Third, different times need different views of knowing and doing. Modern people say one thing and do another, talk on paper, talk without practice, and there are countless examples of knowing the law and breaking the law. From the misappropriation of public funds by Taiwan Province International Bill Company and the Fourth Credit Cooperative to the black sheep of Beijing Municipal Government's corruption and fraud case, we find that they all know the law and break the law. Can you say that the other party doesn't know? (Applause) Today, why do we say that it is easier said than done? That is, let people really find out that his mistake lies in: you know, but you don't do it. Therefore, it is easier said than done to tell everyone that it is a painful lesson and the right medicine. It is the real combination of knowledge and action.

Wu Jianmin: Talking about it means having a deep understanding. Is it thorough? That cicada still cries "cicada" and "cicada" in the tree all day. Lin Zhengjiang: I want to ask my opponent. Today, almost any China person or any human being knows that the murderer is dead, or it is wrong to kill. It's so easy to know today, so why are there so many people who can't control their inner desires and kill people? So (applause) it's "difficult". Lu Han: Yes, those people didn't know the power and dignity of the law until he died and went to the execution ground. Liu told you long ago: "Knowing is knowing, not knowing is not knowing." Don't obscure the meaning of knowledge. According to what you said, there are friends from six places under the stage. They can't make it to the finals. If we don't win the championship, do you think they don't understand the debate? Yang Wei: The other classmate just told us that "knowledge is moral conscience". Therefore, Confucius said well, saints are born to know, but we are all human beings. We should "learn and know". Is it difficult? Gu Zhenhao: The other debater should stop avoiding questions. Back to the last question, do you know the law and break it? Doesn't this highlight the so-called easy to know? Zhong Chan: Then I want to ask my opponent's defensive friends. From the birth of the law to now, do you know the way to really stop knowing the law and breaking the law? Just now, the other classmate said that we are a combination of knowledge and practice, and there will be some practices in the process of understanding, but the essence is still understanding! I also flip through books when I am reading. Did the other classmate say that I was flipping through books instead of reading? Li: Opponents, let me give you an example. If judges are corrupt and lawyers bend the law today, who knows the law better than lawyers and judges? Isn't this the best example of knowing the law and breaking the law? Wu Jianmin: What the other debater said is wrong, which just reflects that these lawyers and judges don't know the majesty of our law and the true meaning of our law! They don't know the old saying, "The French Open is slow, but it doesn't leak"! I'll ask my opponent's debater, and you say you know it's easy, so I'll ask my opponent's debater to explain it to you. Is it "chicken lays eggs" or "egg lays chicken"? Why has mankind discussed it for so long, and there is still no correct answer? Lin Zhengjiang: According to you, we won't know until the mistake appears. Then everyone who smokes knows that smoking is harmful to health, because just look at the cigarette case. According to his opponent, he didn't know until someone beat him to death. Or he won't know until he's dead. Lu Han: My opponent, it seems that you still don't know much about smokers! They know better that a cigarette after a meal is better than a living fairy. Liu: So, for other debaters, it is a series of arduous struggles to gain real knowledge. Isn't this process just a "trip"? Yang Wei: Of course, this process of seeking knowledge is also a cicada. We say that knowledge means seeking knowledge and learning! Action is the meaning of action. Another student said it's good to know, so please tell the people of Zaire how to prevent and treat that terrible Ebola virus, which is even more terrible than AIDS. Lin Zhengjiang: The other debater said it very well. If we define the process of cognition as knowledge, as another debater said, then we will find that knowledge is basically everywhere today. But this is not the case. Today, for me, seeking knowledge is an act. If there is any difficulty, as another debater said, it is the act of seeking knowledge, not knowledge itself. Zhong Chan: When we talk about knowing and doing comparison, it is of course a process of comparing knowing and doing. Another student compresses knowledge into a result and expands the line into a process, so how can a result and a process be more difficult? Gu Zhenhao: According to another student, after the principle appears, the next step should be very simple. Then Plato told us about the realm of an "ideal country" two thousand years ago. Why hasn't an ideal country appeared today? & ltbr & gt Wu Jianmin: Debate friend, that's because we haven't found the right way to get to the ideal country, or we don't know much about it! The other debater just said it was easy to know, so we have to ask each other, are there aliens in this world? How can we communicate with aliens and make friends? Liu: Another debater said "Utopia" because there was no way. Then Marx has constructed the ideal blueprint and realization steps of capitalist society, so why do you need Mr. Mao Zedong and Mr. Deng Xiaoping to devote themselves to reform? Why is China still in the "primary stage of socialism"? Isn't "doing" more difficult than "knowing"? Lu: Didn't you see the other debater? After we put forward the correct reform strategies and methods, China's reform has made great achievements in 17! I would like to ask another debater, Sister Lin of Daguan Garden, who drank so much ginseng soup and tonic, that lung disease could not be cured. Today, consumption can be cured, and there are endless terminal diseases. Isn't this the credit for "knowing" or "doing"? Lin Zhengjiang: Don't jump out of the discussion. Today's knowledge is a static cognition and understanding. Any student with a high school education or above knows Einstein's great formula-"The energy that a substance can emit is equal to the mass of the substance multiplied by the square of the speed of light", and also knows that the atomic bomb is produced according to this formula. Then I want to ask everyone here, have you seen any high school graduates who make atomic bombs? Yang Wei: Do other students remember this famous saying? Montaigne of France said: "Memorizing is not equal to mastering knowledge." Li: In other words, your opponent thinks that if there is a doctor who specializes in treating gastric ulcers, and he himself has gastric ulcers today, don't you want to say that he doesn't know how to treat and maintain them? Zhong Chan: This doctor is going to find a doctor who is more proficient in treating gastric ulcer to treat his illness! Just now, the other classmate said that learning is not seeking knowledge, and studying hard is not seeking knowledge. Only those diplomas are "knowledge". Then why do we start from elementary school and get our diplomas only in our senior year? Lin Zhengjiang: Opponents, we all know that people make mistakes. According to you, as long as you can make mistakes, you don't know, so we have two questions for you to answer directly. First, if you don't know that as long as you can make mistakes, "everyone makes mistakes", who in this world knows this truth? Secondly, if, according to what you said, keeping the correct concept is knowledge, then in which century will the real knowledge, your knowledge, appear when mankind dies? Another classmate said it well. In Song Dynasty, Lu Jiuyuan once said, "If you know your mistakes, you can go, and if you know your mistakes, you can change them." If he really knows the truth, how can he not correct his mistakes? Li: In other words, under the framework of the opposition party, do you really know when it will appear? It may not appear until the death of the earth. So "I love my teacher, I love truth more" should be changed to "I love my teacher, I love ignorance more"! Wu Jianmin: We say that knowledge is a process, and knowledge is a process of accumulation bit by bit. Debate friends, we accumulate true knowledge all the time in the process of seeking knowledge. How can we say that real knowledge will not be available until the earth dies? So what the other debater means is that all four of you debaters are "ignorant" people sitting here? Lin Zhengjiang: The other debater said it very well. Another debater, you also admit that real knowledge happens through the constant test of action, so the difficult thing should be the process of action, which is full of difficulties. When the process of action overcomes the difficulties, true knowledge naturally comes into being, which is the true meaning of "knowing from things" today. Lu Han, another debater, said that knowing comes from doing things, so knowing is easier said than done. Then we know that human beings evolved from apes. According to another debater, is it miserable to be a monkey, or even more difficult, while it is easy to live as a human being? Gu Zhenhao: Another debater, please don't apply the definition of "knowledge" mentioned by Mr. Wang Yangming. Do you also tell us that charcoal must be compressed before it can be turned into diamonds? Then charcoal is actually a diamond. Can the opposing debater explain this? Wu Jianmin: The other debater made a mistake, which is the unity of knowledge and action of the other debater. We have said many times that the process of seeking knowledge is knowledge, and our practice is the application of this knowledge. How can we say that we are one of knowing and doing? Liu: Another debater has always told us that when mistakes are constantly discovered, knowledge comes out. According to the logic of the other side's argument, then I will always know and always do it. Isn't this called "integration of knowledge and action"? Wu Jianmin: Does this person constantly know and guide the line, and then gain knowledge from the line? That is to say, knowing is doing, and doing is knowing? So, other debaters, do you know or are you good at sitting here today? Do you know and do it like a person? Lin Zhengjiang: Arguing with the other side is the so-called "conscience". You said that you should use all your efforts to discover "knowledge" today, and these efforts are all actions. Today, "doing" has two meanings: one is to explore the truth, and the other is to practice the truth. How can you say that it is ok to practice the truth instead of exploring it? Those who object please answer directly. Wu Jianmin: We say that seeking truth is of course a process of seeking knowledge. I want to ask another debater, you said it was difficult to do things, so should we make it easy? Lin Zhengjiang: Another debater, what we are dialectical today is a theoretical phenomenon and a truth. Today's "difficulty" is different from whether to encourage people to do it. Even if it is difficult to travel dialectically today, we can still encourage others to do it. What I'm afraid of is that when you advocate quitting today, are you telling the people to leave the difficult things alone for the time being? Lu Han: This is not to say that you should ignore them, but it is necessary to make things simple. What shall we do? We must solve the problem of knowledge! Wang Shuli, an associate professor of sociology at Fu Jen Catholic University, also said: "In recent years, the crime problem in Taiwan Province Province has become increasingly serious, and it is more difficult to find effective strategies." Do you feel the same way? Li: So everyone knows that there should be no crime, violence and bad things. But these things are constantly emerging. Isn't that why he didn't do it? Wu Jianmin: The other debater said it well. It is precisely because other debaters know that they should not commit crimes and make mistakes that we see that all four students are handsome gentlemen. Lu Han: Another debater said that it is difficult to learn from good people and talk about morality now. Therefore, for this phenomenon, we should conduct moral reflection and know why. Is it more difficult? Yang Wei: "People are not born to know." So Confucius said, "If you don't stop learning, it will be enough to close the coffin." Confucius also said, "Never tire of teaching and never tire of learning." Do you know how to learn directions? Zhong Chan: Just now that classmate gave many examples of hard work, but are hard work and sweating hard? Another student thinks it is difficult to run on the playground twice.

This is a part of the text, and some of them are restricted by the text. Just watch the video. Thank you and I wish you success.