Malicious slander of the company on the internet caused losses.

If a company that infringes its reputation right publishes malicious slander, it can immediately bring a lawsuit to the judicial organ for settlement. Judicial decisions and sentencing for infringement of reputation rights can be handled according to relevant legal basis. Specific cases should be handled by judicial organs after investigation and evidence collection.

1. What should I do if I publish a malicious slander against the company and infringe on my reputation?

Article 120 of the General Principles of the Civil Law: If a citizen's right to name, portrait, reputation and honor is infringed, he has the right to demand that the infringement be stopped, his reputation be restored, the influence be eliminated, an apology be made, and he may demand compensation for losses. Where the right of name, reputation and honor of a legal person is infringed, the provisions of the preceding paragraph shall apply.

134th ways to bear civil liability mainly include:

(1) Stop the infringement;

(2) remove obstacles;

(3) eliminating danger;

(4) returning property;

(5) restitution;

(six) repair, rework and replacement;

(7) Compensation for losses;

(8) Paying liquidated damages;

(9) Eliminating the influence and restoring the reputation;

(10) Apologize.

The above ways of bearing civil liability can be applied separately or in combination. In trying civil cases, the people's courts may, in addition to applying the above provisions, admonish them, order them to make a statement of repentance, confiscate their illegal income and property, and may impose fines and detention according to law. Therefore, the punishment of infringing on the right of reputation can require the people's court to make a judgment on the infringer: stop the infringement, restore the reputation, apologize, compensate for the losses, and demand compensation for mental damage. If the infringer refuses to implement it, he may:

1. The people's court shall make an announcement in relevant newspapers and periodicals, and the expenses required shall be borne by the infringer.

2. The people's court shall impose penalties such as fines and detention.

3. Apply to the people's court for compulsory execution of property.

4. Payment of deferred payment

Second, what are the ways to infringe on the right of reputation?

1. Insult

Insult refers to the act of deliberately degrading the personality and damaging the reputation of others by means of violence, language, writing and cartoons.

The forms of insult are: (1) insulting others with verbal language or actions (non-violence). (2) insulting others by violence. (3) Insulting others in written language.

Step 2 slander

Defamation refers to the act of spreading false facts intentionally or negligently and degrading the reputation of others. The so-called "intentional" refers to the behavior that the actor who spreads false facts knows that the facts he spreads are fictitious and nonexistent, but still spreads because it can degrade the reputation of others; The so-called "negligence" refers to the act of spreading false facts without knowing that they are false, but because they can achieve the purpose of attack, they degrade the reputation of others or spread and spread out of curiosity. If the facts spread by the actor are not false, and the spread of these facts involves privacy, its purpose is to derogate from its reputation, and it can also derogate from the reputation of others by revealing personal privacy and bear tort liability.

The forms of libel are: (1) language libel. If the fabricated facts are spread through oral language, it will damage the reputation of others. (2) Defamation of words and cartoons. For example, by writing articles or drawing cartoons, fabricating facts and spreading them, causing damage to the reputation of others.

3. The news report is seriously inaccurate.

News reports are untrue, which means that news reports are inconsistent with the facts. If the news report is seriously untrue and causes damage to the reputation of others, it shall be deemed as infringement of the reputation right of others. However, considering the timeliness of news, there are inevitably some mistakes in news reports, so there is general inaccuracy in news reports and there is no need to infringe on reputation rights. Only if the news report is seriously untrue and causes damage to the reputation of others can it be considered as an act of infringing on the right of reputation.

These comments are very inappropriate.

A serious inappropriate comment refers to a situation in which a comment on someone or something is obviously inconsistent with the actual situation. When the comments are seriously inappropriate and cause damage to the reputation of others, it should be considered as infringement of the right of reputation. However, based on the concept of freedom of speech, it is not appropriate to criticize and comment. Therefore, if the comments are just improper words or inaccurate sentences, and there is no intentional or negligent act of insulting others' personality, it cannot be considered as infringement of others' reputation rights.

Infringement of the right of reputation is common in judicial practice, and its manifestations are very diverse. In particular, publishing malicious libel statements on the Internet has constituted a criminal fact of infringing on the right of reputation. The relevant departments of the company may sue the illegal acts of the parties to the judicial organs, or demand compensation from the parties.