What impact does the new policy of "ipo poverty alleviation" bring to listed companies?

Some enterprises can benefit from relocation:

Modern service company with strong profitability and light assets. For example, some brokers or internet companies have no special requirements for the main production and business premises. If they were eager to go public by backdoor before, it would be better to move into poor areas through the relocation of their registered places or the establishment of new branches to promote employment, contribute taxes and stimulate local economic growth.

The way to buy shell companies in poor areas is to take the green channel;

(1) Is there any connection between the main business of the enterprise to be listed and the "shell company"?

(2) Whether the actual controller has changed.

(3) the impact of reorganization on the issuer's total assets, operating income or total profit.

IPO poverty alleviation, that is, IPO priority policy for listed companies in poverty-stricken areas, will transfer the registered place of listed companies to poverty-stricken areas in the west and increase local fiscal revenue.

These will be the key issues to be considered in IPO. A better way of operation is to set up a subsidiary in poor areas as early as possible, take the subsidiary as the main body of listing, and absorb and merge other assets for IPO.