In the "Business Instructions for Zero Life Series Directed Entrusted Investment Projects", there is a saying:
The Company's responsibility to pay the principal and income of the directional entrusted investment to customers is limited to the investment principal and income actually received by the Company under the targeted entrusted investment, and the Company does not undertake any guarantee, capital preservation commitment or any responsibility for the principal and any income (including any expected income) of the entrusted investment funds of customers.
In other words, if you invest in odd jobs, the investor's principal and income are not guaranteed. So there may be good gains and losses at the same time. Of course, the goods-based baby may also lose money, but because the investment scope of odd jobs is different from that of goods-based babies, it can be judged that the risk of odd jobs is greater than that of "goods-based babies".
Generally speaking, the "baby" of the monetary fund has many similarities, such as investment threshold and interest-bearing method, but the risk is greater than that of the cargo-based baby, and of course the income is correspondingly higher than that of the cargo-based baby. If you can bear higher risks and pursue higher returns than the goods-based baby, you can consider investing in odd jobs.