How to deal with anti-monopoly cases of economy and people's livelihood?

On August 1, the 7th China Competition Policy Forum hosted by the Expert Advisory Group of the State Council Anti-monopoly Committee and hosted by university of international business and economics Competition Law Center released the top ten anti-monopoly cases, with the following characteristics:

Dare to use a knife in a big company. Throughout the typical antitrust cases, we can see that many well-known large companies are involved. For example, Tetra Pak abused its dominant market position. After 4 years 10 months of investigation, the administrative penalty decision was 47 pages long, and finally it was determined that six enterprises of Tetra Pak Group abused their dominant market position, and the regulatory authorities issued a fine of up to 670 million yuan. Tetra Pak's illegal and monopolistic behaviors, such as tying and restricting transactions without justifiable reasons, have been corrected, and the competition order in relevant markets has been restored.

Touch the cheese of the department. If government departments abuse administrative power in the process of providing public services, they will also be punished for violating the Anti-Monopoly Law. 20 16 found that "the relevant departments of twelve provincial governments abused administrative power to exclude and restrict competition in the construction of new houses" is a typical case. This case involves two provincial government orders, two provincial government office documents and eight provincial government department documents issued by 12 province in the "new housing distribution" construction market. Due to the effect of excluding and restricting competition, these documents were abolished, stopped or modified, and the fair competition order in the construction market of "new house allocation" was restored.