In the company, as a leader and manager, if you can't handle the small contradictions among employees fairly, it will hinder the development of work and persuasion in front of employees. If subordinates with high positions are favored, the following ordinary employees will think that the leaders are justifying their weaknesses and think that the leaders don't care about the feelings of ordinary employees and command people with high positions. As a leader, you will lose the trust of employees, and you will encounter difficulties in your future work.
Second, as a leader, he will keep his bottom line when dealing with employee conflicts.
In the company, even as a leader, he serves the company and employees collectively, rather than being centralized by his family. He can do whatever he wants, fire whoever he wants, and forgive whoever he wants. The bottom line is a person's professional ethics, so if you want to be a good leader, you must have your own professional ethics and integrity, do things impartially, and don't practice favoritism.
Third, dealing with employee conflicts in the company is often unreasonable, even if it is reasonable.
No matter in which industry, in which occasion, when dealing with contradictions, everyone is basically based on the principle of helping parents, so that everyone can decide the final handling opinions. Therefore, if the leader favors the subordinates with high status, even if the subordinates themselves are the dominant party, after unfair treatment, everyone will think that the subordinates are the one who is indefensible, so this is actually not a way to help each other, but to give advice to each other from a pertinent point of view.