1. To see whether a company is good or bad, we must first understand its market environment and the company's own market situation. If the company's market is doing well, it is generally promising, and the shortcomings can only be made up. If the market is not doing well, no matter how good it is, it is useless to manage and regulate it at this time. High salary is also temporary, not long-term. This is the case with Chengdu * * Alliance Company. What a pity!
Secondly, most workers have great opinions about wages, which is a complicated issue. Judging a company from its salary is the biggest misunderstanding. After all, most of them are private enterprises now, not state-owned enterprises.
It depends on the essence: whether the backbone of this company takes more or less, whether the company takes more when the general benefit is good, whether the hard-working and responsible people take more, whether the ability is improved or not, whether there is a clear reward and punishment system and it is implemented seriously, whether the core backbone is less in prison (work prison is inevitable, boss prison is many, haha), whether ordinary employees are promoted continuously, and whether the year-end reward is given.
If these answers are generally affirmative, it shows that this company is acting in accordance with the laws of market economy. Then the workers can consider going (of course, it is not good for them to judge blindly first).
The public says that the public is right, and the woman says that the woman is right. Only the laws of market economy can't be false.
3. Payment of fixed salary: Is the salary clearly stipulated in the contract (or stipulated in the trial contract)? Are wages always paid on time? Is it clear that there is no such inexplicable deduction in the payment of wages (except of course illegal deduction)?
If so, basically this company is credible.
4. About social security: Is there a clear statement (especially the probation period)? Do all employees who formally work in the company have social security? Social security may be less at first. Will the social security base increase after working 1 year?
If so, basically this company is large and standardized in principle.
5. About overtime: Everyone doesn't like overtime, but they have to work overtime. Overtime mainly depends on whether the individual has completed the task to work overtime, and whether the company has asked for overtime but worked overtime. Is it included in the performance appraisal? Do people with better jobs work overtime (generally excellent people work overtime less)?
It is unrealistic to expect to get overtime pay soon after working overtime. It is unrealistic to work overtime to earn money in the short term, but it is generally rewarding in the long run.
To find out that you don't work overtime, only companies that don't have to work don't have to work overtime.
In fact, overtime is an attitude problem for both companies and individuals. If overtime work in the company can be linked to personal growth and promotion, it is basically desirable.
6. Development of the company: See if the company is growing? Is the business and market expanding? Is the product expanding? Is the number of employees growing? Is the customer base growing? Is the customer losing money?
If the overall situation is positive, then the company is growing, and it is inevitable to work hard here, but the return can be expected.
7. Look at the employees in the company: Are there many old employees? Have many employees stayed for more than 2 or 3 years? Are old employees the backbone core? Are most of them high level? Is the income of the backbone core old employees high? Are they active at work? Are there any rapidly rising new employees (1 year)?
If it is basically positive, then the company's values basically conform to the laws of market economy and adhere to this reasonable value orientation principle for a long time.
This can reflect the overall basic situation of a company. Everything can be fake, this one can't be fake, and everything can be packaged. This can't be packed. When other circumstances cannot be judged, it can be used as an important basis for evaluating the company. When you first enter a company, you can start the analysis and evaluation from this point.
8. Imprisoned employees: What are the identities of most of them? Are they low-level? Are they dedicated to their work? Poor sense of responsibility? Are FANCH's key employees still diligent in their work?
If these are basically positive, don't be influenced by these prisoners, they are worthless.
They have little influence on the company. They are not the mainstream. If workers want to go up and succeed, they must move closer to the mainstream.
There are only two kinds of companies without prisons: one is dead and the other is extremely mature and decadent.
Everyone complains a lot about American prisons, but everyone still yearns for this country, which is why.
Summary: We look at a problem dialectically, and everything has two sides. Look at things from phenomenon to essence. Only in this way can our workers be truly invincible in this highly competitive professional society.
The above experience is shared with everyone, and personal opinions are welcome to correct me! ~