Eight dollars, the basis of the year-end award.
First of all, here, the school gave an explanation when it learned that these teachers protested collectively. The reason why there is such a year-end bonus is mainly because of this year's performance reform, and these teachers' class fees cannot be directly allocated to technical schools, resulting in a decline in their year-end bonus. At the same time, these teachers' pensions were paid directly two years in advance, which led to their pensions replacing part of the year-end awards.
Why did the teachers collectively protest?
It is obviously unreasonable for teachers to collectively protest against eight dollars. After all, they must be very aware of this when deducting these pensions or performance reforms, mainly because in this salary and year-end award exhibition, they found that the salary of some administrative posts is much higher than that of their teaching and administrative posts, and there are some low-level administrative posts, and the salary even exceeds that of professors. This is the root cause of their dissatisfaction.
How to treat this incident?
First of all, the school's handling of the problem must be flawed. After all, the salary level of professors is not as high as that of administrative posts, and there must be something wrong. Therefore, the school's wage division is flawed, which is the reason why teachers are not satisfied. Before, the school always thought that the teacher's dissatisfaction was due to the year-end award, which was obviously evasive.