Legal analysis: if there is no agreement between shareholders, then profits will be distributed according to the proportion of paid-in capital contribution, not according to the proportion of subscribed capital contribution; If the shareholders of the company have other agreements on profit distribution, such as not according to the proportion of paid-in capital contribution, but according to the proportion of subscribed capital contribution or directly agreeing on the profit proportion of each shareholder, it is ok, no matter what the proportion of capital contribution is, as long as the agreement between shareholders does not violate the mandatory provisions of laws and regulations, it can even be agreed that a shareholder will give up the right to profit distribution, but it cannot be agreed that a shareholder will not assume shareholder obligations.
Legal basis: Article 34 of the Company Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), shareholders receive dividends in proportion to their paid-in capital contribution; When the company increases its capital, shareholders have the priority to subscribe for the capital contribution in proportion to the paid-in capital contribution. Except that all shareholders agree not to pay dividends according to the proportion of capital contribution or not to subscribe for capital contribution in priority.