What are the improvements compared with Article 63 of the original Company Law, Article11and Article1of the new Company Law? Great gods, help!

Article 63 of the original Company Law Directors, supervisors and managers who violate laws, administrative regulations or the company's articles of association when performing their duties shall be liable for compensation. Article 111 Where the resolutions of the shareholders' general meeting and the board of directors violate laws and administrative regulations and infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of shareholders, shareholders have the right to bring a lawsuit to the people's court to demand that the illegal acts and infringing acts be stopped. New Company Law: Article 153 Where a director or senior manager (note that Article 63 was only a manager) violates laws, administrative regulations or the articles of association and damages the interests of shareholders, shareholders may bring a lawsuit to the people's court. Obviously, there is no mention of derivative litigation of shareholders here, but all the direct litigation of shareholders! Derivative litigation is a new provision in the new Company Law in 2005, and it is the second half of Article 152. The so-called derivative litigation means that shareholders are not qualified to sue because the company is an independent legal person and has a legal representative. Why do your shareholders sue on behalf of the company? But now the law gives you this right, which is called deduction. Direct litigation means that a company director or an executive infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of your shareholders, and you sue for your own small share of interests. Derivative litigation is to sue the person who damages the company on behalf of the company (at this time, the shareholder is equivalent to the legal representative of the company), such as a member of the board of directors or a member of the board of supervisors or a senior executive. Article 152, in a nutshell: if a director or senior manager damages the company, eligible shareholders may request the board of supervisors to sue; If the supervisor damages the company, eligible shareholders may request the board of directors to sue. Note that the prosecution here is a written lawsuit filed by qualified shareholders to the board of directors or the board of supervisors in the name of the company, and the defendant is a director or senior manager or supervisor who damages the company. However, in reality, the interests of senior executives and Gao Dong often have the same, implicated and joint interests, so when your shareholders request to file a lawsuit, they are likely to be ignored, so there will be the following derivative litigation, that is, if they ignore the shareholders' request to file a lawsuit, or fail to file a lawsuit for more than 30 days, the shareholders can directly file a lawsuit on behalf of the company. Or because the situation is urgent, if you don't sue immediately, you will suffer great losses. Eligible shareholders can directly file a lawsuit on behalf of the company in their own names, without going through the above written request stage, directly! Some details here stipulate that you can see for yourself. For example, a limited liability company is the qualification of all shareholders, and a joint stock limited company is the qualification of shareholders who hold 1% of the company's shares individually or collectively for more than 180 days. ..... What is the improvement you ask? Compared with the new article11,the original article1obviously has a wider scope of direct shareholder litigation. Article 153 says that anyone who violates laws, administrative regulations and the company's articles of association can bring a lawsuit, while article11has no provisions on the company's articles of association, and article11only says that you can bring a lawsuit to stop it. Are you okay? Hehe, ask first whether it is direct or derivative, which is obviously direct. It seems that you have not understood the concept of derivative litigation! Let's go!