This move by Wolf Warrior Company is indeed suspected of infringing on Mr. Jason Wu's right of portrait and reputation. As a public figure, Jason Wu's portrait has certain commercial value. If a merchant uses another person's portrait as an element to promote goods without his consent, it actually infringes on the right of portrait and reputation of others. Let's look at the relevant national laws.
Article 10 1 of the General Principles of Civil Law stipulates? Citizens and legal persons enjoy the right of reputation, and the personal dignity of citizens is protected by law. It is forbidden to damage the reputation of citizens and legal persons by insulting or slandering. ? Article 100 of the General Principles of Civil Law stipulates? Citizens have the right to portrait, and their portraits shall not be used for profit without their consent. ?
It can be seen that the loss of Wolf Warrior Company is a foregone conclusion, and there is no problem with the court's decision, which is well-founded. Because Jason Wu is a big star and a person with certain social influence, he has no heavy responsibility to the other party. All the judgments are made according to the General Principles of Civil Law, but the performance of Wolf Warrior Company is a bit dead rhythm. After the final judgment, it did not pay compensation to Mr. Jason Wu within the stipulated date, but kept delaying, believing that it was delaying.
Wu has applied to the court for enforcement, and Wolf Warrior Company has been restricted from spending. Wolf Warrior Company initially wanted to use Jason Wu's popularity to promote its products. After selling its own products, it made money, and then came to talk about cooperation with Mr. Jason Wu. I didn't expect this to happen just after I went out. As I said, legal management and honest management are the king, and these crooked ways should be rectified. One word can describe it, and that is? Serves you right.