I personally understand that not only American technology companies are willing to be acquired at a high price, but also most technology companies in other countries are willing to be acquired at a high price. The reason is the word "high price". For entrepreneurs who start a business, after getting the "sky-high" return, they can start a business again and be acquired, forming a cycle. In this cycle, personal wealth continues to accumulate, and the new enterprises they create continue to grow and develop. Another reason is that for enterprise management and operation, enterprise production is the weakness of bosses who rely on technology to start businesses. Most people are good at turning a technology into a product, which can reflect the market demand, but how to produce and operate enterprises often don't know how to deal with it. Personally, I think this is also the reason why technology companies are willing to be acquired at high prices. Third, the anti-monopoly law of the United States stipulates that when enterprises are suspected of monopolizing, the law requires them to impose sanctions, so Bill Gates separates Microsoft from Internet companies.